Appearance
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. QUESTION: Given the sentence "A chef holds this lid of a dish in one hand and a microphone in the other hand." is it true that "A chef holds a lid and a microphone before making an announcement."? Let's solve it slowly: Just because a chef holds a microphone does not mean that they are making an announcement. The answer is it is not possible to tell. [QUESTION] Premise: "There are 5 men wearing orange jumpsuits and blue hard hats on four levels of scaffolding next to a building." Hypothesis: "The men wore orange jumpsuits." Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? If the men are wearing orange jumpsuits then they wore jumpsuits. The answer is yes. Q: Premise: "A young child with his face in his plate." Hypothesis: "A child finishes meal." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no A: A child with his face in a plate does not imply the child finishes a meal. The answer is it is not possible to tell. QUESTION: Test for natural language inference. Premise: "A young man in uniform is standing with his back to a museum case that has a classical bust on the top shelf." Hypothesis: "An active-duty military man is looking at his cell phone." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Let's solve it slowly: A young man in uniform is not necessarily an active-duty military man and not necessarily looking at his cell phone. The answer is it is not possible to tell. [QUESTION] Given the sentence "Two dogs are urinating on the red fire hydrant." is it true that "No animals are urinating."? One sentence is about two dogs urinating while the other is about no animals urinating. The answer is no. Q: Can we conclude from "Two children are bouncing on their toys behind a gated housing complex." that "Two kids play with their favorite toys."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell A:
answer:Two children bouncing on their toys does not necessarily mean they are playing with their favorite toys. The answer is it is not possible to tell.
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. next question: What could a massive building be if it is not constructed well? Options: - insubstantial - massless - dwarf - inconsequential - good reasoning:
answer:A massive building that is not constructed well could be "insubstantial." The reasoning behind this is that if a building is poorly constructed, it may not be sturdy or reliable enough to serve its intended purpose. Its structural integrity could be compromised, making it unsafe for occupants or vulnerable to damage from external factors such as natural disasters. Therefore, despite its large size, it would be considered insubstantial because it lacks the necessary strength and stability to function effectively as a building.
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Lizzy: Tameka is selling boxes of crackers for her scout troop. On Friday, she sold 40 boxes. On Saturday, she sold 10 fewer than twice that number. And on Sunday, she sold half as many as Sunday. How many boxes did she sell over the three days?. Me: Hmmm, let me think. I think this is the detailed solution:
answer:Step 1: Determine the number of boxes Tameka sold on Saturday. On Friday, Tameka sold 40 boxes. The problem states that on Saturday, she sold 10 fewer than twice the number of boxes she sold on Friday. To find this amount, first, double the number of boxes sold on Friday: 2 * 40 = 80 Then, subtract 10 from this number to find the number of boxes Tameka sold on Saturday: 80 - 10 = 70 So, Tameka sold 70 boxes on Saturday. Step 2: Determine the number of boxes Tameka sold on Sunday. The problem states that on Sunday, Tameka sold half as many boxes as she did on Saturday. To find this amount, divide the number of boxes sold on Saturday by 2: 70 / 2 = 35 So, Tameka sold 35 boxes on Sunday. Step 3: Add the number of boxes Tameka sold on each day to find the total number of boxes she sold over the three days. Friday: 40 boxes Saturday: 70 boxes Sunday: 35 boxes 40 + 70 + 35 = 145 Tameka sold a total of 145 boxes over the three days.
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Brady will make 450 more in a year than Dwayne. If Dwayne makes 1,500 in a year, how much will Brady and Dwayne make combined in a year? Let's think first. Chain of thought:
answer:Step 1: Identify the given information. - Dwayne makes 1,500 in a year. - Brady makes 450 more in a year than Dwayne. Step 2: Determine how much Brady makes in a year. - Since Brady makes 450 more than Dwayne, we can add 450 to Dwayne's annual income to find out how much Brady makes in a year. - Brady's annual income = Dwayne's annual income + 450 - Brady's annual income = 1,500 + 450 Step 3: Calculate Brady's annual income. - Brady's annual income = 1,950 Step 4: Calculate the combined annual income of Brady and Dwayne. - Combined annual income = Brady's annual income + Dwayne's annual income - Combined annual income = 1,950 + 1,500 Step 5: Determine the combined annual income of Brady and Dwayne. - Combined annual income = 3,450 So, Brady and Dwayne will make a combined total of 3,450 in a year.