trump

🔍

question:给个示例

answer:以下是一个使用FFmpeg重新传输缺失的RTP数据包的示例： 1. 使用FFmpeg查找缺失的RTP数据包首先，可以使用FFmpeg的"`-loglevel debug`"参数来打印详细的调试日志，以查找缺失的RTP数据包的序号。例如，假设需要重新传输的RTP数据包序号为"1234"，可以在FFmpeg的调试日志中搜索"1234"，找到如下类似的日志： ``` [udp @ 0x7f3198005e00] 'abuf_size': 64, 'seq': 1234, 'pts': 3993600, 'dts': 3993600, 'duration': 960 [udp @ 0x7f3198005e00] RTP: missed 1 packets [udp @ 0x7f3198005e00] 'abuf_size': 64, 'seq': 1235, 'pts': 3994560, 'dts': 3994560, 'duration': 960 ``` 可以看到，日志中记录了缺失的RTP数据包序号为"1234"，以及缺失的包之前和之后的数据包序号为"1233"和"1235"。 2. 使用FFmpeg重新传输数据包根据找到的缺失数据包序号，可以使用FFmpeg重新发送缺失的RTP数据包。例如，假设使用UDP协议进行数据传输，可以使用如下的命令重新传输数据包： ``` ffmpeg -i input.sdp -re -map 0 -c copy -f rtp udp://localhost:1234?localport=5432&pkt_size=1300&ttl=16 ``` 其中，"input.sdp"是RTP数据包的源SDP文件，"-re"参数表示按照实时速率进行读取数据包，"-c copy"表示使用原始的编解码器进行复制，"-f rtp"表示输出数据包的协议为RTP，"udp://localhost:1234?localport=5432&pkt_size=1300&ttl=16"表示要发送到的目标地址。根据实际情况逐步调整参数。需要注意的是，重新传输的数据包可能会引入新的网络延迟和带宽开销，需要考虑到实时性和网络负载等因素，以保证数据传输的质量和稳定性。

question:FFmpeg不使用PCMA

answer:如果不使用PCMA编码格式，可以尝试使用其他编码格式来编码音频数据。以下是一些其他常用的音频编码格式： 1. PCM（Pulse-code modulation）：无损音频编码格式，是音频压缩的基础，可用于对音频数据进行编码和解码。PCM编码格式最常用的采样频率为44.1 kHz，采样位深度为16位。 2. AAC（Advanced Audio Coding）：常用于音频流媒体传输，由MPEG-2标准的AAC-LC（Low Complexity）和MPEG-4的AAC-LD（Low Delay）等多种类型。AAC编码格式在音频数据压缩方面表现良好，可以提供高品质的音频效果。 3. MP3（MPEG Audio Layer III）：目前最流行的音频格式之一，能够以高压缩比压缩音频数据，但同时也保留了良好的音频质量。 4. FLAC（Free Lossless Audio Codec）：无损音频编码格式，支持高压缩比和多通道音频处理，适用于需要保留音频质量的应用场景。使用以上音频编码格式，可以通过修改FFmpeg的命令行参数来指定不同的音频编码器，例如使用AAC编码器： ``` ffmpeg -i input.wav -c:a aac -b:a 256k output.mp4 ``` 此命令会将WAV音频文件编码为AAC编码格式的音频数据，并输出到MP4容器中并保存至output.mp4文件。需要注意的是，不同的编码格式具有不同的音频质量和压缩比。在选择编码格式时，需要综合考虑音频质量、编解码效率和输出文件大小等因素，以达到适合的要求和效果。

question:Too many bits 8832.000000 > 6144 per frame requested, clamping to max

answer:这个警告通常是因为编码器请求的输出比特率超过了FFmpeg接受的最大比特率而导致的。当FFmpeg检测到比特率过高时，它会自动将比特率设置为FFmpeg所允许的最高值并发出此警告信息。解决这个问题可以尝试以下方法： 1. 调整输出比特率通过减低输出比特率来避免该警告。可以通过使用`-b:v`或`-b:a`选项，或者使用`-crf`选项来控制输出比特率。例如： ``` ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -c:v libx264 -b:v 4M -c:a aac -b:a 320k output.mp4 ``` 在此示例中，将输出比特率限制在4Mbps和320kbps之间。 2. 使用更高效的编码器选择更高效的编码器也是一种解决方法，可以降低输出比特率并获得更好的视频质量。例如，使用HEVC编码器（例如`-c:v libx265`）可以在保持较低比特率的情况下提供更好的视频品质。 3. 调整分辨率和帧率减小分辨率和帧率是另一种有效的降低输出比特率的方法。可以通过使用`-s`和`-r`选项来控制输出视频分辨率和帧率。例如： ``` ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -c:v libx264 -s 1280x720 -r 30 -c:a aac -b:a 320k output.mp4 ``` 在此示例中，将输出视频分辨率限制为1280x720，帧率为30fps，并将输出比特率限制在320kpbs以下。 4. 使用更高级的音频编码格式如果该警告是来源于音频流，则可以尝试更换为更高效的音频编解码器，例如`-c:a aac`或者`-c:a opus`等。需要注意的时，虽然可以解决此警告，但过高或过低的比特率均会对视频或音频的质量产生负面影响。因此，应尽可能根据实际情况选择合适的输出比特率。

question:In class I stated that any 2nd or 3 rd order polynomial that goes through the points 0 1 , 3 y       and 1 1 , 3 y       would have the same integral over the range -1 to 1 as the line (remember, there is only one) that goes through the same two points. The easiest way to prove that the areas are all the same (and demonstrate why) is using NDDP. First, let’s construct a 1st order NDDP through the points above, and calculate the area under that line for -1 ≤ x ≤ 1. The NDDP equation for the 1 st order polynomial (straight line) that goes through points  0 0,x y and  1 1,x y is:        1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0,f x f x x f x x a a x x      It will turn out that we don’t even need to know 0f or  1 0,f x x . They are simply constant values that we can carry around. I’m going to replace them with simpler terms:    1 0 1 0f x a a x x   Now let’s integrate this line from -1 to 1:     1 21 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 line x x A a a x x dx a x a                 From the 2-point Gauss Legendre, 0 1 3 x  . Then   1 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 32 1 11 1 1 1 3 32 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 33 3 2 2 3 line a A a x x a a a a a a a a                                                                          Just to recap, this is the area under the curve, between x = -1 and x = +1, of the straight line that goes through points at  0 0,x y and  1 1,x y . In truth, though, this value doesn’t matter. What we do next is what matters. The NDDP equation for the 2nd order (quadratic) polynomial that goes through points  0 0,x y ,  1 1,x y , and  2 2,x y is:                 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 , , ,f x f x x f x x x x x x f x x x a a x x a x x x x             Now let’s integrate this quadratic polynomial from -1 to 1:              1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 quad line A a a x x a x x x x dx a a x x dx a x x x x dx A a x x x x dx                             I broke it into two integrals to help you visualize that, to make Aquad = Aline, what has to happen is for the integral of the last term of the NDDP to be zero. Let’s see what it is:    1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 3diffA a x x x x dx a x x dx                            1 31 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 11 1 11 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 diff x x A a x dx a a                                      Since we did not define the values of  2 2,x y , the 2 nd order NDDP expression above describes every quadratic that goes through points  0 0,x y and  1 1,x y . The above identity proves that the area under the curve from x = -1 to x = +1 for every quadratic that goes through points  0 0,x y and  1 1,x y is equal to the area under the line through the same points and over the same range. To prove that the area under every cubic polynomial is the same as the area under the line, let’s add another generic point  3 3,x y and look at the 3rd order NDDP.                           0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 03 0 1 2 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 3 0 1 2 , , , , , , f x x f x x x x x x f x x x f x x x x x x x f x x x x a a x x a x x x x a x x x x x x                           The area under this curve, between x = -1 and x = +1, is:                   1 0 1 0 2 0 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 2 1 cubicA a a x x a x x x x a x x x x x x dx a a x x dx a x x x x dx a x x x x x x dx                                 The first integral is the area under the line, and we already know that the second integral is zero. (a) To show that the area under the cubic polynomial is equal to the area under the straight line, show that the third integral in the above expression is zero (b) To show that this only works for polynomials up to 3 rd order, add another generic point  4 4,x y , express the 4th order NDDP, and integrate it from x = -1 to x = +1. We already know that the integral of the first two terms of the NDDP is the area under the line, and the integrals of the 3rd and 4th terms are zero. Show that the integral of the 5 th term in the NDDP is not zero.

answer:(a) We need to show that the third integral in the above expression is zero. Let's calculate it: int_{-1}^1 a_3 (x-x_0)(x-x_1)(x-x_2)dx. Since x_0 = 0, x_1 = frac{1}{3}, and x_2 = frac{2}{3}, we have int_{-1}^1 a_3 x(x-frac{1}{3})(x-frac{2}{3})dx. Now let's integrate by parts, u-substitution and polynomial integration: a_3 int_{-1}^1 x(x-frac{1}{3})(x-frac{2}{3})dx = a_3 frac{1}{270}(frac{6561x^4}{4} - frac{2187x^3}{3} + frac{324}{1}). Evaluate the above expression between -1 and 1: a_3 left[frac{1}{270}(frac{6561}{4} - frac{2187}{3} + frac{324}{1}) - frac{1}{270}(frac{6561}{4} + frac{2187}{3} + frac{324}{1})right] = 0. So the third integral is zero. Therefore, the area under the cubic polynomial is equal to the area under the straight line. (b) Add another generic point (x_4, y_4), express the 4th order NDDP, and integrate it from x = -1 to x = +1: f(x) = a_0 (x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)(x-x_4) + a_1 (x-x_0)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)(x-x_4) + a_2 (x-x_0)(x-x_1)(x-x_3)(x-x_4) + a_3 (x-x_0)(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_4) + a_4(x-x_0)(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3) We already know that the integral of the first two terms of the NDDP is the area under the line and the integrals of the 3rd and 4th terms are zero. We need to check if the integral of the 5th term in the NDDP is nonzero: int_{-1}^1 a_4(x-x_0)(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)dx = a_4 int_{-1}^1 x(x-frac{1}{3})(x-frac{2}{3})(x-1)dx. This integral involves a 5th-degree polynomial, i.e., an odd-degree polynomial. Odd-degree polynomials have different properties compared to even-degree polynomials because they tend to have positive and negative halves, which do not necessarily cancel out, i.e., the integral of an odd-degree polynomial may not be zero. Let's calculate the integral using polynomial integration: a_4 int_{-1}^1 x(x-frac{1}{3})(x-frac{2}{3})(x-1)dx = a_4 frac{1}{810}(frac{19683x^5}{5} - frac{6561x^4}{2} + frac{324}{1}). Evaluate the above expression between -1 and 1: a_4 left[frac{1}{810}(frac{19683}{5} - frac{6561}{2} + frac{324}{1}) - frac{1}{810}(- frac{19683}{5} - frac{6561}{2} + frac{324}{1})right] = a_4 frac{2}{405}(6561 + 19683) neq 0. The integral of the 5th term in the NDDP is not zero. This implies that the area under the 4th-order polynomial going through points (0, y_0), (frac{1}{3}, y_1), (frac{2}{3}, y_2), and (1, y_3) might not be the same as the area under the straight line connecting the first and last points.